What Porosity Means for Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace

Additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized aerospace component production, enabling the creation of complex geometries previously impossible with traditional manufacturing methods. However, one critical challenge continues to limit the widespread adoption of AM in aerospace applications: porosity. Understanding porosity, its causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies is essential for anyone involved in aerospace additive manufacturing.

Understanding Porosity in Additive Manufacturing

Porosity refers to the presence of voids or cavities within a manufactured component. In additive manufacturing, these defects occur as small, often microscopic holes that can significantly compromise the structural integrity and performance of aerospace parts. The presence of porosity is particularly concerning in aerospace applications where component failure can have catastrophic consequences.

The aerospace industry's stringent requirements for component reliability make porosity control a critical factor in determining whether additive manufacturing can be successfully implemented for specific applications. Material porosity in these parts is undesirable for aerospace parts - since porosity could lead to premature failure, making it essential to understand and control this phenomenon.

Types of Porosity in Additive Manufacturing

Gas Porosity

Gas porosity occurs when gas bubbles become trapped within the molten pool during the printing process. Gas bubbles can originate inside the molten pool from shielding gas, metal vapors, and gases trapped inside powders during atomization. The formation of gas porosity depends on two critical time factors: the time needed for a gas bubble to rise and escape out of the molten pool and the solidification time of the pool.

Keyhole Porosity

Keyhole porosity represents one of the most challenging defects in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Keyhole pores are one of the major defects in the commonly-used additive manufacturing (AM) technique laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). This type of porosity forms when deep, narrow vapor depressions called keyholes become unstable and collapse, trapping gas bubbles beneath the surface.

Recent research has revealed that keyhole porosity can initiate not only in unstable, but also in the transition keyhole regimes created by high laser power-velocity conditions, causing fast radial keyhole fluctuations (2.5–10 kHz). The formation process involves rapid bubble growth due to pressure equilibration, followed by shrinkage due to metal-vapor condensation.

Lack of Fusion Porosity

Lack of fusion porosity occurs when powder particles fail to completely melt and fuse together. This lack of fusion is caused by a portion of the powder bed materials not reaching the melting temperature when considering a single layer thickness and applied laser power. This type of defect typically results from insufficient energy density, improper processing parameters, or poor powder bed quality.

Impact on Aerospace Components

Mechanical Properties

Porosity has severe implications for the mechanical properties of aerospace components. Gas porosities can significantly degrade the tensile and fatigue properties of parts. The presence of pores acts as stress concentrators, reducing the overall strength and durability of components under operational loads.

Fatigue Performance

Perhaps most critically for aerospace applications, porosity dramatically affects fatigue life. However, porosity defects remain a major barrier to LPBF's use in fatigue-sensitive applications like aircraft wings. Keyhole porosity is a key concern in laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF), potentially impacting component fatigue life. The cyclic loading conditions common in aerospace applications make components with porosity particularly susceptible to premature failure.

Structural Integrity

The aerospace industry demands components with exceptional reliability and predictable performance. Porosity introduces variability and unpredictability into component behavior, making it difficult to ensure the consistent performance required for critical aerospace applications.

Current Detection and Monitoring Technologies

Real-Time Detection Methods

Significant advances have been made in detecting porosity formation during the printing process. US Researchers have developed a way to detect keyhole porosity during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, opening up the possibility of using the 3D printing process in more parts of an aircraft. The new inspection approach combines x-ray and near-infrared imaging processes to detect the exact moment a keyhole pore forms during the printing process.

Non-Destructive Testing

X-ray computed tomography (CT) has emerged as the gold standard for porosity detection and analysis. X-ray tomography has emerged as a uniquely powerful and non-destructive tool to analyze defects in additive manufacturing. This technology allows for comprehensive three-dimensional visualization of internal pores without damaging the component.

Mitigation Strategies

Process Parameter Optimization

The most fundamental approach to reducing porosity involves optimizing processing parameters. The lowest porosity regime is shown to be in a narrow range, with the threshold for lack of fusion being very sharp and the formation of keyhole mode pores showing only a gradual increase with power. This requires careful balancing of laser power, scanning speed, hatch spacing, and layer thickness.

Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP)

Hot Isostatic Pressing has become the industry standard post-processing technique for eliminating porosity in aerospace AM components. HIP is highly effective at closing most typical porosity distributions. The process works by applying high temperature and pressure simultaneously, During HIP processing, micro and macro porosity are removed by a complex combination of plastic yielding, creep and diffusion effects as material moves uniformly to fill voids from all directions.

HIP offers particular advantages for aerospace applications: Since the pores in as-printed powder based AM material are homogeneously distributed throughout the material, the shrinkage generated during HIP will be homogeneous in all directions over the volume, and corresponding to the amount of porosity removed. Thus, no distortion of the net shape AM parts is to be expected during HIP.

However, HIP is not without limitations. Exceptions are highly interconnected pores and pores near the surface, which can be more challenging to eliminate and may require additional considerations during processing.

Advanced Scanning Strategies

Researchers are developing innovative scanning strategies to reduce porosity formation. Studies have shown that strategic deposition approaches can significantly reduce defect formation, with some demonstrating up to 73% reduction in lack-of-fusion defects compared to conventional approaches.

Material and Powder Quality Control

The quality of feedstock materials plays a crucial role in porosity formation. Gas bubbles can originate inside the molten pool from shielding gas, metal vapors, and gases trapped inside powders during atomization. Ensuring high-quality powders with minimal trapped gases and optimal particle size distribution is essential for minimizing porosity.

Industry Applications and Success Stories

Commercial Aviation

Major aerospace manufacturers are increasingly implementing porosity control strategies in their AM operations. Companies like Airbus, Boeing, and GE Aerospace have developed comprehensive approaches to managing porosity in critical components, combining optimized processing parameters with post-processing techniques like HIP.

Space Applications

The space industry has unique requirements for porosity control due to the extreme operating environments and long mission durations. Control of porosity was demonstrated with porosity bands of 23.5-47.9% for copper, 0.8-55.3% for bronze, and 8.0-50.2% for brass in spacecraft applications, showing that controlled porosity can sometimes be beneficial for specific functions like thermal management.

Future Directions and Emerging Technologies

Machine Learning and AI

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are increasingly being applied to predict and prevent porosity formation. A primary obstacle impeding the use of metal additive manufacturing technologies in fatigue-sensitive applications is the presence of porosity, primarily caused by keyhole instability. Advanced modeling approaches are being developed to accurately forecast keyhole behaviors and optimize processing parameters in real-time.

In-Situ Monitoring

The development of real-time monitoring systems represents a significant advancement in porosity control. "Our approach provides a viable solution for high-fidelity, high-resolution detection of keyhole pore generation that can be readily applied in many additive manufacturing scenarios", according to researchers developing these technologies.

Alternative AM Processes

Some additive manufacturing processes inherently reduce porosity concerns. In contrast to fusion welding-based metal additive manufacturing, the friction-based solid-phase additive manufacturing process keeps the process temperature below the melting point of the base materials. Therefore, fusion-based defects such as porosities, hot cracks, and coarse grain structures, which are related to the melting and solidification process, can be avoided in solid-phase additive manufacturing.

Economic and Market Implications

The global additive manufacturing market for aerospace components is experiencing significant growth, with Counterpoint estimates that the market for AM components grew by 30% between 2022 and 2023, reaching a total of around $1 billion globally. However, porosity concerns continue to limit adoption in critical applications.

Successful porosity control directly impacts the economic viability of aerospace AM applications. The cost of implementing comprehensive porosity control strategies, including advanced monitoring systems and post-processing like HIP, must be balanced against the benefits of improved component reliability and performance.

Regulatory and Certification Considerations

The aerospace industry operates under strict regulatory frameworks that require comprehensive documentation and validation of manufacturing processes. Porosity control strategies must be thoroughly validated and documented to meet certification requirements from organizations like the FAA, EASA, and other regulatory bodies.

The development of industry standards for porosity acceptance criteria and testing methodologies is ongoing, with organizations like ASTM International and ISO working to establish comprehensive guidelines for aerospace AM applications.

Conclusion

Porosity remains one of the most significant challenges in aerospace additive manufacturing, but the combination of advanced process control, real-time monitoring, and post-processing techniques is making it increasingly manageable. The successful implementation of porosity control strategies is essential for realizing the full potential of additive manufacturing in aerospace applications.

As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see continued improvements in porosity detection, prevention, and mitigation techniques. The aerospace industry's commitment to safety and reliability drives continued innovation in this critical area, ensuring that additive manufacturing can meet the demanding requirements of aerospace applications while maintaining the highest standards of component integrity.

The future of aerospace additive manufacturing depends largely on the industry's ability to consistently produce components with minimal porosity and predictable performance characteristics. Through continued research, development, and implementation of advanced porosity control strategies, the aerospace industry is positioning itself to fully leverage the transformative potential of additive manufacturing technology.

Sources

  1. Mitigation of Gas Porosity in Additive Manufacturing Using Experimental Data Analysis and Mechanistic Modeling - PMC. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11013015/

  2. Porosity detection breakthrough will expand additive manufacturing use | Aerospace Testing International. Available at: https://www.aerospacetestinginternational.com/news/materials/porosity-detection-breakthrough-will-expand-additive-manufacturing-use.html

  3. Caltech researchers explore porosity control of copper-based alloys in AM for spacecraft applications. Available at: https://www.metal-am.com/caltech-researchers-explore-porosity-control-of-copper-based-alloys-in-additive-manufacturing-for-spacecraft-applications/

  4. Metal Additive Manufacturing for Aerospace Components 2024 : Counterpoint Market Intelligence. Available at: https://counterpoint.aero/product/additive-manufacturing/

  5. Mechanism of keyhole pore formation in metal additive manufacturing | npj Computational Materials. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-022-00699-6

  6. Keyhole fluctuation and pore formation mechanisms during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing | Nature Communications. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28694-x

  7. Research team detects additive manufacturing defects in real-time | ScienceDaily. Available at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/01/230106144508.htm

  8. Understanding keyhole induced-porosities in laser powder bed fusion of aluminum and elimination strategy - ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890695522001286

  9. Keyhole fluctuation and pore formation mechanisms during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing - PubMed. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35246522/

  10. Accurate keyhole instability prediction in metal additive manufacturing through machine learning-aided numerical simulation | NIST. Available at: https://www.nist.gov/publications/accurate-keyhole-instability-prediction-metal-additive-manufacturing-through-machine

  11. A critical review on the effects of process-induced porosity on the mechanical properties of alloys fabricated by laser powder bed fusion | Journal of Materials Science. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10853-022-06990-7

  12. Effects of process parameters on porosity in laser powder bed fusion revealed by X-ray tomography - ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214860419306979

  13. Porosity Measurements and Analysis for Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Control - PMC. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4487290/

  14. Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion - ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214860416300471

  15. How to Prevent LPBF Defects: A Guide to High-Quality Additive Manufacturing. Available at: https://insidemetaladditivemanufacturing.com/2025/02/10/how-to-prevent-defects-in-lpbf-components/

  16. A strategic approach to minimize lack of fusion defects in wire arc additive manufacturing | Progress in Additive Manufacturing. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40964-025-01020-9

  17. Linking process parameters with lack-of-fusion porosity for laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing - ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214860423001136

  18. Mitigation of lack of fusion defects in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing - ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1526612518302603

  19. Hot isostatic pressing in metal additive manufacturing: X-ray tomography reveals details of pore closure - ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860420305637

  20. HIP - Hot Isostatic Pressing - Bodycote. Available at: https://www.bodycote.com/hot-isostatic-pressing/

  21. Hot Isostatic Pressing: Improving quality and performance in AM. Available at: https://www.metal-am.com/articles/hot-isostatic-pressing-improving-quality-and-performance-in-3d-printing/

  22. AM 101: What Is Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP)? (Includes Video) | Additive Manufacturing. Available at: https://www.additivemanufacturing.media/kc/what-is-additive-manufacturing/articles/am-101-what-is-hot-isostatic-pressing-hip-includes-video-

  23. Hot isostatic pressing - Wikipedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_isostatic_pressing

  24. Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) Services for Advanced Manufacturing by California Nanotechnologies. Available at: https://www.calnanocorp.com/nanotechnologies-news-corner/hot-isostatic-pressing-hip-services-for-advanced-manufacturing

  25. what is Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP)? Available at: https://www.aalberts-st.com/processes/hot-isostatic-pressing/

  26. Hot Isostatic Pressing. Available at: https://www.ansto.gov.au/services/advanced-manufacturing/hot-isostatic-pressing

  27. Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) technology improves critical aerospace components - Hiperbaric. Available at: https://www.hiperbaric.com/en/hot-isostatic-pressing-hip-technology-improves-critical-aerospace-components/

  28. Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) | Additive Manufacturing Material. Available at: https://am-material.com/titanium-based-alloy-powder/hot-isostatic-pressing-202408082/

  29. Experimental and numerical analysis of friction stir additive manufacturing of 2024 aluminium alloy - ScienceDirect. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S235249282300329X

  30. Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing of Nano-Treated Aluminum Alloy 2024 - PMC. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11057550/

  31. Robust Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Aerospace Components | Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-022-06850-0

Previous
Previous

Additive Manufacturing and the Future of Unmanned Systems